This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — |
induction_and_cotesian_numbers [2026/09/14 21:16] (current) paulmeyer Add page to explain the relationship between the induction chart and Cotesian numbers |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | **Note:** The following explanation was largely AI-generated (via Gemini), and could likely benefit from additional manual verification by humans. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====Why the Induction Chart Diagonal Matches the Cotesian Numbers==== | ||
| + | The diagonal numbers on the [[induction_chart|Go First Dice induction chart]] match the **[[http:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===1. The Fairness Condition is a Polynomial Moment Problem=== | ||
| + | In a set of [[fairness# | ||
| + | |||
| + | * If a die's face values are mapped continuously onto the normalized interval [0, 1], the probability that a value //x// ∈ [0, 1] exceeds //k// other uniformly distributed dice is proportional to **// | ||
| + | * For the set to be fair for all subset sizes //k// = 0, 1, 2, ..., //n//, the expected value of // | ||
| + | |||
| + | > // | ||
| + | > (for all //k// = 0, 1, ..., //n//) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===2. The Induction Step Uses Equally Spaced Positions=== | ||
| + | When inducing an (// | ||
| + | |||
| + | > // | ||
| + | > (where //i// = 0, 1, ..., //n//) | ||
| + | |||
| + | To achieve permutation fairness, the discrete number of faces (or weights // | ||
| + | |||
| + | > ∑< | ||
| + | > (for every monomial // | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===3. The Unique Solution: Newton–Cotes Quadrature Weights=== | ||
| + | By definition, the [[http:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Because any polynomial is a linear combination of the monomials {1, //x//, // | ||
| + | * Because face counts on physical dice must be whole numbers, the weights must be scaled up to integers. The diagonal entries on the induction chart are the **sums of these integer Cotesian weights**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^ //n// (Players Added) | ||
| + | | **//n// = 1** | Trapezoidal Rule | 1/2, 1/2 | 1, 1 | **2** | | ||
| + | | **//n// = 2** | Simpson' | ||
| + | | **//n// = 3** | Simpson' | ||
| + | | **//n// = 4** | Boole' | ||
| + | | **//n// = 5** | 6-point Rule | 19/288, 75/288, 50/288, 50/288, 75/288, 19/ | ||
| + | | **//n// = 6** | Weddle' | ||
| + | | **//n// = 7** | 8-point Rule | 751/17280, 3577/17280, 1323/17280, 2989/17280, 2989/17280, 1323/17280, 3577/17280, 751/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Key Takeaway=== | ||
| + | The induction chart diagonal numbers are the numerators of the Normalized Cotesian numbers because fairly ranking //n//+1 dice is isomorphic to integrating degree-// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Why is n = 8 a Dash on the Chart?=== | ||
| + | An interesting consequence of this equivalence explains why the diagonal entry at **//n// = //m// = 8** on the [[induction_chart|induction chart]] is a dash (**-**): | ||
| + | * For //n// = 8 (a 9-point closed Newton–Cotes rule), the quadrature weights include **negative numbers** (specifically, | ||
| + | * Because physical dice faces cannot be negative, no valid die can be formed from this direct unmixed induction at //m// = 8. (Solutions for //n// = 8 only start appearing at //m// = 9). | ||